Our phone lines are currently not accepting calls due to a network outage. Please email all Social Security Disability inquiries to stacy@donatilaw.com. All other inquiries can be directed to amy@donatilaw.com.

Donati Law, PLLC
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Our History
  • Our Team
    • Don Donati
    • Wanda Donati
    • William "Billy" Ryan
    • Alison Ryan
    • Bryce Ashby
    • Robert Donati
    • Ellen Donati Flechas
    • Janelle Crandall Osowski
    • Melissa Stewart
    • Ruchee J. Patel
  • Practice Areas
    • Employment Law
    • Car Accidents
    • Consumer Law
    • Civil Rights
    • Criminal Defense
    • Immigration Law
      • Resources
      • Family Immigration
      • Employment Immigration
      • Asylum & Refugee Status
    • Personal Injury
    • Social Security Disability
    • Wage & Hour Violations
    • Workers' Comp
  • COVID Resources
    • ADA Reasonable Accommodation: COVID-19
    • COVID-19 Safety Complaints & Whistleblower Protections
    • Medical and Family Leave: COVID-19
  • Blog
  • Results
  • Testimonials
  • Contact Us
(901) 209-5500

Call for Prompt Legal Assistance

    • Home
    • About Us
    • Our History
    • Our Team
      • Don Donati
      • Wanda Donati
      • William "Billy" Ryan
      • Alison Ryan
      • Bryce Ashby
      • Robert Donati
      • Ellen Donati Flechas
      • Janelle Crandall Osowski
      • Melissa Stewart
      • Ruchee J. Patel
    • Practice Areas
      • Employment Law
      • Car Accidents
      • Consumer Law
      • Civil Rights
      • Criminal Defense
      • Immigration Law
        • Resources
        • Family Immigration
        • Employment Immigration
        • Asylum & Refugee Status
      • Personal Injury
      • Social Security Disability
      • Wage & Hour Violations
      • Workers' Comp
    • COVID Resources
      • ADA Reasonable Accommodation: COVID-19
      • COVID-19 Safety Complaints & Whistleblower Protections
      • Medical and Family Leave: COVID-19
    • Blog
    • Results
    • Testimonials
    • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Contact
  • Staff
Blog /2013 /April /The Sequential Evaluation Process - Step 3: Listings of Impairments


Categories
  • ADEA
  • Affordable Care Act
  • Age Discrimination
  • Arbitration Agreements
  • At-Will Employment
  • Breach of Contract
  • Car Accident
  • Carbon Monoxide
  • Claim Management
  • Class Action
  • Commercial Appeal
  • Commission-Based Employees
  • Congress
  • Criminal Defense
  • Criminal Record
  • DACA
  • Disability
  • Disability Claim
  • Discrimination
  • DOMA
  • DREAM Act
  • EITC
  • Employee Misclassifications
  • Employment Law
  • Employment Termination
  • Estate Law
  • Expungement
  • Fair Credit Reporting Act
  • Family and Medical Leave Act
  • FAQ
  • FLSA
  • Fraud
  • Gender Discrimination
  • Government Shutdown
  • Health
  • ICE
  • Immigration
  • Immigration Law
  • Immigration Reform
  • Independent Contractor
  • Insurance
  • jones act
  • Leave & Break Rights
  • LGBT
  • Local News
  • Long Term Disability
  • Medical Malpractice
  • medicare
  • Misclassification
  • mississippi river
  • Motorcycle Accident
  • News
  • Non-Compete & Non-Disclosure Agreements
  • Overtime Wages
  • personal injury
  • President Obama
  • Qui Tam
  • Retaliation
  • Semi-Truck Accident
  • Sequential Evaluation Process
  • Severance Agreement
  • Sexual Harassment
  • Short Term Disability
  • slip and fall
  • Small Businesses
  • social security
  • Social Security Administration
  • Social Security Card
  • Social Security Disability
  • Social Security Disability Benefits
  • Social Security FAQs
  • Social Security Number
  • SSDI
  • SSI
  • State Law
  • Taxes
  • Technology
  • Tipped Employees
  • TPPA
  • Trip and Fall
  • Unemployment Benefits
  • Unlawful Presence
  • USCIS
  • veterans
  • Veterans' Benefits
  • Visa
  • Visa Bulletin
  • Wage & Hour
  • Whistleblower
  • Wills
  • Workers' Compensation
  • Workplace Retaliation
  • Wrongful Death
  • Wrongful Termination
Share This Post:

The Sequential Evaluation Process - Step 3: Listings of Impairments

Apr 22, 2013 /
Donati Law, PLLC
  • Sequential Evaluation Process /
  • Social Security Administration /

After it has been determined that a claimant has a “severe impairment,” the claimant’s impairment is of a severity to meet or medically equal the criteria of an impairment listed in 20 CFR part 404, Subpart P, Appendix 1 (20 CFR 404.1520(d), 404.1526). If the claimant’s impairment or combination of impairments is of a severity to meet or medically equal the criteria of a listing, then the claimant is disabled. If the claimant cannot meet these requirements, then you proceed to Step 4 of the Sequential Evaluation Process.

Notably, up until this point, the first two steps presented ways for the Social Security Administration to deny a claim, not ways for them to approve. However, at Step 3, the SSA can actually say “yes” and award a claimant disability. Unfortunately, to get to get an award at this level is no easy task, as the Administration is looking for the claimant to meet extremely rigorous medical requirements.

Example 1: Back Problems

E.g. Degenerative Disc Disease, osteoarthritis, herniated nucleus pulposus, etc). There are few different ways to meet the listings based on a back impairment, one of the most common provision is Listing 1.04 A. It states you can be approved for your back impairment under this:

A. Evidence of nerve root compression characterized by neuro-anatomic distribution of pain, limitation of motion of the spine, motor loss (atrophy with associated muscle weakness or muscle weakness) accompanied by sensory or reflex loss and, if there is involvement of the lower back, positive straight-leg raising test (sitting and supine);

To establish this, a claimant will need to have radiological (e.g. x-rays or MRIs) documentation confirming the condition. He then needs “evidence of nerve root compression.” This is commonly referred to as radiculopathy. Though it is not specifically called for in the Listings, some DDS and ODAR staff will not accept clinical (observations of pain made by the doctor in person) to establish that you have this. Instead, they will require additional proof in the form of an EMG/Nerve Conduction testing that may or may not be able to pick up radiculopathy.

Then, the claimant must demonstrate all of the other elements of this provision. He must have a doctor observe and write down that he has decreased range of motion, muscle atrophy/weakness and decreased sensation (sensory loss). Finally, there must be documentation of positive straight-leg raise testing, and this needs to be for both the sitting and supine (laying down) position.

In the areas where I practice, it is virtually impossible to expect medical providers, even good providers to have all of this information present in their records. For instance, I cannot recall seeing records from an orthopedist who during the course of his normal treatment obtained straight-leg raise test lying down, then did separate testing for the client while sitting. Yet, the absence of this one clinical test can serve as the basis for denying a claimant under the Listings.

Finally, keep in mind what is not considered in these Listings. There is no mention whatsoever about surgeries that have been performed or physical therapy that has been completed. There is no mention about the effect of heavy pain medication. It is therefore entirely possible that someone who has had multiple back surgeries and is prescribed narcotic pain medication like hydrocodone would not qualify under the Listings because just one of the elements listed above was absent in from the treatment records.

Equaling The Listings

Though the Listings of impairments address a great number of impairments, it has a number of glaring omissions. For instance, the Listings do not currently contain stand-alone criterion for evaluating either diabetes or sarcoidosis. However, this does not mean that a claimant with these conditions could not be found to be disabled under the Listings. Instead, the rules allow for an ALJ to evaluate a claimant’s condition under the Listing criteria that closely approximates the kinds of limitations experienced by the claimant.

For instance the Listing 3.03B for Asthma allows for an award of benefits where a claimant has:

Attacks, in spite of prescribed treatment and requiring physician intervention, occurring at least once every 2 months or at least six times a year. Each in-patient hospitalization for longer than 24 hours for control of asthma counts as two attacks…

Sarcoidosis can cause major respiratory problems often requiring hospitalization. A claimant with a sarcoidosis and have four 24-hour hospital stays could be found to equal Listing 3.03B for asthma.

In my experience, the question of equivalence is rarely addressed at either the DDS or Hearings level. At the Initial and Reconsideration levels, the examiners and non-consulting doctors are not explicitly asked to look for possible equivalence. Even if they did want to look for these theories, practically speaking, DDS staff rarely has the time to consider these types of arguments.

Typically, ALJs will be reluctant to consider someone’s claim under the medical equivalence. Because of the highly technical nature of such a determination it is much more likely to be reviewed by staff from the Appeals Council and could result in a remand back to the ALJ. To the extent that the ALJs will consider these arguments, they will require a statement from a doctor (whether treating or consulting) that offers an opinion as to medical equivalence.

Previous Next

Every Client is a Cause We Believe In

To discuss your case with an accomplished attorney who cares, give our firm a call at (901) 209-5500 or fill out the form below.

  • Please enter your name.
  • This isn't a valid email address.
    Please enter your email.
  • This isn't a valid phone number.
    Please enter your phone number.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.

Recent Posts

  • 5 Common Instances of Medical MalpracticeJanuary 24, 2025
  • How to Report Racial Discrimination at WorkJanuary 8, 2025
  • What Is Third Party Sexual Harassment?December 20, 2024

Most Popular

  • 6 Signs Your Boss Is Gaslighting You at WorkOctober 28, 2022
  • Can the Actions of a Swearing Boss be Considered Abusive Workplace Behavior?December 5, 2023
  • Is It Hard to Get Another Job if You Sue Your Employer?June 7, 2022

A Tradition of Legal Excellence

Our team of professionals seek justice one client at a time, because every client is a cause we believe in. We keep things simple, by consistently showing our dedication not only to the law, but to our clients. Passionate about honoring the law and respecting every client, our firm strives to make the legal changes that are needed to improve the lives of people throughout our community.

donati law icon shield
  • Created from the D & L of Donati Law
  • Resembles the emblem of the medieval Donati family
  • The Donati family originates from Florence, Italy
  • The emblem signifies our fight to protect a neighbor or friend
  • Symbol of our efforts to protect the interests of our clients
donati law logo

Memphis

1545 Union Avenue
Memphis, TN 38104

(901) 209-5500

Memphis

1545 Union Avenue
Memphis, TN 38104
View Map

Phone: (901) 209-5500

Quick Links

  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Site Map
  • Privacy Policy

Stay Connected

  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Facebook
  • Google Business Profile
En EspaƱol

Contact Us

Donati Law, PLLC
Memphis Attorneys

1545 Union Avenue
Memphis, TN 38104
View Map

Call Today

(901) 209-5500

Local
https://www.donatilaw.com/

Seeking Justice One Client at a Time

Contact Us Now
Internet Marketing Experts The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
© All Rights Reserved.
Powered by Scorpion